REST vs GraphQL in 2025: Which API Design Should You Choose?
Compare REST and GraphQL API architectures. Learn the pros, cons, and best use cases for each approach to build better APIs.
The API Architecture Decision
Choosing between REST and GraphQL affects your entire application architecture. Let's compare these approaches in 2025.
REST: The Standard
REST (Representational State Transfer) has been the standard for decades:
- Resource-Based: URLs represent resources
- HTTP Methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
- Stateless: Each request is independent
- Cacheable: HTTP caching built-in
REST Example
GET /api/users/123
GET /api/users/123/posts
GET /api/posts/456/comments
GraphQL: The Flexible Alternative
GraphQL offers a query language for APIs:
- Single Endpoint: One URL for all queries
- Client-Specified: Request exactly what you need
- Strongly Typed: Schema defines all types
- Introspection: Self-documenting API
GraphQL Example
query {
user(id: "123") {
name
posts {
title
comments {
text
}
}
}
}
Key Differences
| Aspect | REST | GraphQL |
|---|---|---|
| Endpoints | Multiple | Single |
| Data Fetching | Fixed | Flexible |
| Caching | HTTP native | Custom |
| Learning Curve | Lower | Higher |
| Over-fetching | Common | Avoided |
REST Advantages
1. Simplicity
Standard HTTP methods everyone understands.
2. Caching
HTTP caching works out of the box.
3. Tooling
Mature ecosystem of tools and libraries.
4. Statelessness
Easy to scale horizontally.
GraphQL Advantages
1. No Over-fetching
Request only the fields you need.
2. Single Request
Get related data in one query.
3. Type Safety
Schema provides compile-time checks.
4. Developer Experience
Excellent tooling and playground.
When to Choose REST
- Simple CRUD Operations: Standard resource management
- Public APIs: Easier for third-party developers
- Caching Critical: Need HTTP caching
- Team Familiarity: Team knows REST well
- Microservices: Service-to-service communication
When to Choose GraphQL
- Complex Data Requirements: Nested, related data
- Mobile Applications: Minimize data transfer
- Rapid Iteration: Frontend needs flexibility
- Multiple Clients: Different data needs per client
- Real-time Features: Subscriptions built-in
The Hybrid Approach
Many teams use both:
- REST for simple operations: CRUD, file uploads
- GraphQL for complex queries: Dashboard data, reports
Performance Considerations
REST
- Multiple round trips for related data
- Potential over-fetching
- Excellent caching
GraphQL
- Single request for complex data
- N+1 query problem if not careful
- Requires custom caching
Our Recommendation
For most web applications, REST remains the simpler choice. Choose GraphQL when you have complex data requirements or multiple clients with different needs.
Consider using tRPC for TypeScript projects - it offers type-safe APIs without the complexity of GraphQL.
Explore API tools in our Tools directory or compare options with our Compare tool.