Convex vs Supabase vs Firebase: Real-Time Backend Showdown 2025
Compare the top real-time backend platforms. Detailed analysis of Convex, Supabase, and Firebase for modern web applications.
The Backend-as-a-Service Evolution
Choosing the right backend platform is crucial for modern web applications. In 2025, three platforms dominate the real-time backend space: Convex, Supabase, and Firebase.
Platform Overview
Convex: The Reactive Database
Convex represents a new paradigm in backend development with its reactive, TypeScript-first approach.
Key Features:
- Reactive Queries: Automatic real-time updates
- TypeScript End-to-End: Full type safety from database to frontend
- ACID Transactions: Strong consistency guarantees
- Serverless Functions: Integrated backend logic
- File Storage: Built-in file handling
Unique Selling Point: Zero-config real-time - queries automatically update when data changes.
Supabase: The Open Source Firebase Alternative
Supabase provides a PostgreSQL-based platform with a comprehensive feature set.
Key Features:
- PostgreSQL: Full SQL database power
- Row Level Security: Fine-grained access control
- Real-time Subscriptions: Listen to database changes
- Auth: Built-in authentication
- Edge Functions: Deno-based serverless
Unique Selling Point: Open source and self-hostable with full PostgreSQL capabilities.
Firebase: The Google Ecosystem
Firebase offers a mature, battle-tested platform deeply integrated with Google Cloud.
Key Features:
- Firestore: NoSQL document database
- Realtime Database: JSON-based real-time sync
- Cloud Functions: Node.js serverless
- Authentication: Comprehensive auth providers
- Hosting: Fast static hosting with CDN
Unique Selling Point: Best mobile SDK support and Google Cloud integration.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Convex | Supabase | Firebase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database Type | Document (reactive) | PostgreSQL | NoSQL (Firestore) |
| Real-time | Automatic | Subscription-based | Excellent |
| Type Safety | Excellent | Good | Moderate |
| Self-hosting | No | Yes | No |
| SQL Support | No | Full | No |
| Pricing Model | Usage-based | Predictable | Usage-based |
Real-Time Capabilities
Convex
// Queries are automatically reactive
const messages = useQuery(api.messages.list);
// UI updates automatically when data changes
Convex's reactive model means you don't need to set up subscriptions - queries automatically update when underlying data changes.
Supabase
// Subscribe to changes
const subscription = supabase
.channel('messages')
.on('postgres_changes', { event: '*', schema: 'public' },
(payload) => console.log(payload))
.subscribe();
Supabase requires explicit subscription setup but offers fine-grained control over what changes to listen for.
Firebase
// Real-time listener
const unsubscribe = onSnapshot(
collection(db, 'messages'),
(snapshot) => {
snapshot.docChanges().forEach((change) => {
// Handle changes
});
}
);
Firebase's real-time capabilities are mature and well-optimized for mobile applications.
Developer Experience
Convex
- Pros: Best TypeScript integration, automatic reactivity, simple mental model
- Cons: Newer platform, smaller community, no SQL
Supabase
- Pros: Familiar PostgreSQL, excellent documentation, open source
- Cons: Real-time requires setup, more complex architecture
Firebase
- Pros: Mature ecosystem, excellent mobile SDKs, extensive documentation
- Cons: NoSQL limitations, vendor lock-in, complex pricing
Pricing Comparison
Free Tier Comparison
| Platform | Database | Bandwidth | Functions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convex | 1GB | 1GB/month | 1M calls |
| Supabase | 500MB | 2GB | 500K calls |
| Firebase | 1GB | 10GB | 2M calls |
Paid Tier (Estimated Monthly Cost for Medium App)
| Platform | ~10K MAU | ~100K MAU |
|---|---|---|
| Convex | $25-50 | $100-200 |
| Supabase | $25 | $75-150 |
| Firebase | $50-100 | $200-500 |
Firebase's usage-based pricing can become unpredictable at scale.
When to Choose Each
Choose Convex When
- Building React/Next.js applications
- Type safety is a priority
- Want automatic real-time without configuration
- Building collaborative features
- Prefer serverless architecture
Choose Supabase When
- Need full PostgreSQL capabilities
- Want to self-host
- Have existing SQL expertise
- Need complex queries and joins
- Prefer predictable pricing
Choose Firebase When
- Building mobile-first applications
- Already in Google Cloud ecosystem
- Need mature, battle-tested platform
- Want extensive third-party integrations
- Building with Flutter or React Native
Migration Considerations
From Firebase to Supabase
- Restructure data from NoSQL to relational
- Migrate authentication (user export available)
- Rewrite queries from Firestore to SQL
- Update real-time subscriptions
From Firebase to Convex
- Map Firestore collections to Convex tables
- Convert Cloud Functions to Convex functions
- Simplify real-time code (automatic in Convex)
- Migrate authentication to Convex or Clerk
From Supabase to Convex
- Convert SQL schemas to Convex tables
- Rewrite queries as Convex functions
- Remove explicit subscriptions (automatic)
- Migrate Row Level Security to Convex rules
Performance Benchmarks
Based on real-world testing:
| Metric | Convex | Supabase | Firebase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Query Latency | 50-100ms | 100-200ms | 100-150ms |
| Real-time Delay | <100ms | 100-300ms | <100ms |
| Cold Start | N/A | 200-500ms | 100-300ms |
Our Recommendation
For new web applications in 2025, Convex offers the best developer experience with its automatic reactivity and TypeScript integration. It's particularly well-suited for Next.js applications.
For teams with SQL expertise or self-hosting requirements, Supabase provides the most flexibility with full PostgreSQL capabilities.
For mobile-first applications or teams already in the Google ecosystem, Firebase remains a solid choice with its mature SDKs and extensive features.
Compare these platforms with our Compare tool or explore backend options in our Tools directory.